CDQ Data Quality as Service
Idea Portal
Idea Portal
Idea Portal
Not all DQ rules should apply for all BP Types (e.g. requiring identifiers for pick-up locations), many of our community members maintain such locations as separate partners (with a certain type). Identifiers can not be assigned to them because they are often not uniquely related to a legal entity, e.g. carrier locations. If all types are rated by the same quality rules this will have a negative impact on the rating.
Solution ideas:
Make benchmarking more granular (e.g. based on BP Type)
Only use shared records for benchmarking
Make it possible to exclude certain records from benchmarking
The same applies for different addresses of a BP. It should be possible to assign have different validation criteria for the different address types https://meta.cdq.com/Address/type. A PO Box Address, e.g. might not need an administrative area but the legal address should.
For benchmarking different quality gates for different BP Types should be used.
Correction of point 2: "Disclosed" not "shared" is meant.
Additional requirements:
Only "real" companies must be compared (no 100%, 0% data quality organizations).
It should be possible to select multiple sources at once (and their names should be displayed in the filtering, not just the IDs).
Natural Persons should also not be checked for identifier existance.